Rigol vs siglent If you’re in the market for a signal generator, you’ve probably narrowed your choices down to two Hello everybody I had the Rigol DP831 and Siglent SPD3303X-E. ; Siglent Hello, There seems to be 2 topics related to the Rigol DHO800/DHO900 series scopes. After leaving this page, you can Re: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E « Reply #270 on: November 28, 2017, 08:40:58 pm » Doofus, Be aware that tautech is associated with Siglent, as nice as he is, so bear this in mind with responses about comparing to other manufacturers. all options) Each have their own requirements Mine selection list is here Screen. The Rigol PVP3150 vs the Siglent PP510 oscilloscope probes in x1 mode. 10 : In comparison to the RIGOL DP832, the SIGLENT SPD3303X offers the same number of channels; however, its third channel is adjustable whereas the RIGOL’s third channel is not. It's less relevant than ever because you don't even have to hack your Rigol to get all those "optional" features that are in Siglent SDS1202X-E vs Rigol DS1202Z-E. 5K (yes, K) memory and for looking at mains power harmonics it is vastly better than the Rigol DS1054Z and probably at least as good as and a lot easier to use than the Siglent 1104X-E. It is 100 MHz bandwidth whereas the Siglent is 200 MHz, so that is a negative unless you pay for the 200 MHz variant (about US$850). 25Gs/s max sample rate vs Siglen't 2Gs/s. In all fairness, they both work well for different purposes. If you want a responsive UI then some of the Rigols are pretty I see specifications of two equipments, Rigol DG1022Z and Siglent sdg1032x, just similar, The Rigol is probable more powerful, but Siglent display is better. I'm starting a project attempting to interface a 24bit precision ADC (LTC2512-24, Fs=819kSPS) with an STM32 MCU. The specifications are a thing but, the on field performance is the final veredict, anyone have experience with these devices? Logged tautech. This is exactly one of the few parameters in making the choice where I might be putting too much importance into it wrt Siglent (vs Rigol and others). Rigol oscilloscopes offer more features and higher performance Oscilloscopes produced by Siglent can take up to half a minute or more to boot up fully, while the Rigol’s models seem to boot up in ten seconds or less. As a hobbyist I didn't hesitate unlocking 100 --> 200 MHz and got the more expensive model "for free". Rigol DS1054Z. So I sent this scope back to Rigol in Germany asking for a refund and I bought a Siglent scope. Contributor; Posts: 35; Country: Re: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E « Reply #125 on: June 22, 2017, 03:59:30 am Rigol DS1054Z or Siglent SDS1104X-U Home. Rigol vs. The features that make Siglent oscilloscopes different from Rigol are discussed below. During our Rigol DS1054Z VS Siglent SDS1202X-E discussion, we’ve talked about the pros and cons of each unit. One topic only allowS discussion of the bugs in the Rigol DHO800/DHO900 series scopes. not background/ADC noise) I'd be using either averaging or hires modes. Re: Rigol DM3058 vs Siglent SDM 3055 Bench multimeters « Reply #6 on: November 17, 2016, 05:08:49 am » If you want to save a few $ there's also the more recently released 4 1/2 digit SDM3045X. Just a very quick look at the new scope from Siglent Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1000X-E (click to enlarge) Following is the Excel table that i have used for the generating the above snapshot: rigol-vs-siglent Download. Frequency Range. Regular Contributor; Posts: 207; Country: Re: Siglent SDS1104X-E vs. Joined 2016. Oscilloscopes produced by Rigol simply tend to be better at more categories than oscilloscopes made by Siglent. The Rigol came without a screen protection (foil), where the Siglent had one, however between Anyway then I decided to check the size of the bigger Siglent out, vs the Rigol. So Siglent SDS1104X-E, while being a cheaper option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $768 Rigol DS1104Z, as seen on the chart below. That´s the main intention of the thread, hoping rigol and siglent take notice about it. When it comes to oscilloscopes, Siglent and Rigol are two of the most well-known brands. It's also worth mentioning that the $647 alternative SIGLENT SDM3065X and SDM3065X-SC Digital Multimeters are a 6 ½ digit DMM (digital multimeter with 2,200,000 counts) incorporating a dual–display. The user manual says in page 50 that siglent SDS1202X-E have really 5 channels, 2 analog and 3 different trigger channels, ok maybe it isn't really true because one is EXT and the other is EXT/5 which is the same as EXT but with attenuation of 5, and the other channel come from the AC mains, to trigger with the AC line, this is a good way to measure power supplies. But if the 3 outputs of the siglent are indeed completely seperate, that is an advantage. In all categories the Both web consoles are basically lag free and update immediately (I tried on a 1gig wired network and using wifi), but the refresh rate seems a bit faster on the Rigol. exe. The specs on any of them (2 or 4 channel) are way above what most people need for an entry-level scope. Sure, the Siglent is nicer, but for for the same price you can have a Rigol plus a decent soldering iron or power supply and a couple of ANENG multimeters. (And I believe that somehow the SDL1030X-E should be convertable to SDL1030X . Winner: Rigol. I had the opportunity to test the Rigol DS1104Z Plus and the Siglent SDS1104X-E oscilloscopes before to buy one of them. Rigol DS1054Z ($375) vs. net (you can get eevblog discount from them) sells refurb DS1054Z (I just looked and can't find one right now). Like Reply All that said, kudos to Rigol for being first to market in this affordable 12-bit space (much as they were with the DS1054) and no doubt pushing Siglent to compete. If you can wait and if it actually drops in a few months at pricing competitive with the Rigol, the Siglent SDS800X HD (direct competitor to the DHO800 series) may be the even better option. At that price point, the Rigol has a different class of challenger that are far more capable than the Lets play with both and see how good 12 bits is. Re: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E « Reply #323 on: June 14, 2019, 11:06:10 am » From time to time Tequipment. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Rigol DS1054Z and Rigol DS1104Z oscilloscopes. The SIGLENT SPD3303X is programmable for five digits of voltage and offers four digits of current display. hendorog. Newbie; Posts: 9; Country: 2 GHz scope: Rigol MSO8000 vs Siglent SDS6000 « on: October 24, 2022, 04:49:16 pm Siglent Vs Hantek Reviews 1. Hello everyone, I would like to ask professionals about which DC load to buy. The infamous "Siglent vs. Comparison of Rigol DS1054Z and Siglent SDS1202X. Their customers are most happy with the Siglemt, but he suggest i would be better of with the Siglent SDS1202X-E. Re: Rigol 5074 vs Siglent SDS2104X Plus vs Keysight DSOX1204G « Reply #99 on: April 12, 2021, 10:47:39 pm » SDS2000X Plus HW frequency counter is always ON at top right of display plus several other frequency related measurements can be selected from the Measurements menu. Rigol MSO5074 Home. The comparisons help with choosing between the newest and most popular oscilloscopes. Affiliate links t -R&S SML01 1. Today we're going to be comparing some function generators, so I've pulled the, some equipment off the bench behind me and There are Owon, Siglent and Rigol scopes that are only a little more expensive and much more accurate and user friendly. I did consider the Rigol DS1054Z but it seems like a big downgrade compared to the Rigol DS2074 I sold, I was really tempted to get it to gain the extra 2 channels but the bandwidth is just not enough even with all the "hacks" The difference between Rigol and Siglent? Nowhere near as much. if i had to buy a siglent i wouldn't get anything less than sds1000x series anyway, siglent makes better hardware than rigol, as much better as it can be when you are Rigol Siglent SDS1102X vs Rigol DS1102e. You need to make a list of your must-have features to It's somewhere between the Rigol and Siglent in terms of abilities. "Siglent_50mV" screenshots: Why does the signal rise by 2*50mV on the Rigol, but by 5*50mV on the Siglent, during the same capture period of 10*50µS? Am I reading the displays wrong or have some other kind of mental block? Or are the two scopes still showing different segments of the sine function, with Re: Rigol 5074 vs Siglent SDS2104X Plus vs Keysight DSOX1204G « Reply #123 on: April 16, 2021, 08:45:39 pm » Just a tiny update, as I just bought the Keysight 1204g (I tested it some hours), this is the good information since firmware version 2. Thanks for the information here but I have to ask do you own a Rigol dho804? I am reading in the comments on a couple youtube videos that there has been a firmware update and they are unable to unlock the extra bandwith, which was a big draw to the 804 vs the 814. I understand the main differences, and the two things that peak my interest are that, from what I've read, the FFT appears to be better on the Siglent, and the Siglent has double the sampling rate in Unboxing: The Rigol has a better quality appearance regarding housing/knobs etc. Which oscilloscope is better? Bas compares in this video the Siglent SDS1104X-U and the Rigol DS1054Z on the basis of the specifications, user friendliness a Re: rigol mso5074 vs Siglent SDS2104X Plus « Reply #8 on: November 05, 2022, 02:31:29 am » Yea, like others have said, the SDS2000X Plus is really nice for analog, and hackable to 500MHz (with 2 channels on), no brainer imo. Supporter; Posts: 2647; Country: self-educated hobbyist; Re: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E « Compare value-packed oscilloscopes from RIGOL to more expensive options from Tektronix. Each scope packs some incredible specifications for the price you pay - you won't find better value anywhere else. 1GHz spectrum analyser with similar priced Rigol DSA815. 6kg), however the Siglent housing and display is much larger. Gandalf_Sr. With the 1204, you get 4 200MHz probes that are extremely well-matched with the scope. Since my Siglent SDG1020 has too many limitations for my liking, I'm looking into getting another AWG. Information. Siglent SDS120X-E model - Any Bug stoppers? (Read 15064 times) 0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. Contributor; Posts: 28; Country: Rigol DHO4000 Series vs Siglent SDS3000X Series « Rigol Siglent SDS1202X-E vs Rigol DS1202Z-E. This is in most project not an issue, as you almost never have 3 different grounds. Check out the size difference between Siglent VS. Comparison of the Siglent SDS1102X and Rigol DS1102E: Both of these models have a 100 MHZ bandwidth, 1 GS/S sampling rate, automatic and manual cursor measurements, waveform record / playback feature and 2 vertical input channels. This is important when studying the impact of signal reflections due to mismatches We’ll compare the Rigol DSA815-TG from Rigol and the Siglent SSA3021X from Siglent, two popular models with similar price points and target users. Rigol DS1054Z VS Siglent SDS1202X-E. I have only considered the features that I found relevant for my personal use. Author Topic: 2 GHz scope: Rigol MSO8000 vs Siglent SDS6000 (Read 2935 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Difference Between Siglent and Rigol Oscilloscope. The mysteries of x1 oscilloscope probes revealed: https: Now first Noise floor (again its just what I observe on my two units, others may be different): The Siglent seems to have a lower noise floor (Sig NF1) compared to the Rigol (Rig NF1). Both brands offer oscilloscopes with similar specs, such as bandwidth up to 1 GHz and sample rates up to 2 GSa/s. I also saw a question on the forum about if Rigol was going to update the DM3058 to have a better display and perhaps one up the Siglent. With the SDS800X HD, I have some doubts as to whether the Scope is the answer to Rigol's DHO 800. Siglent SDG1032X As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Rigol DS1054Z Advice? (Read 124720 times) 0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. CORRECTIONS & CLARIFICATIONS BELOWo You can set What price range are you looking at? Rigol Clearance has the DS1102Z-E for $223 right now (vs. If you're just starting out then that seems a better deal, a decent soldering iron or power supply will make a much bigger Saelig has the SDS1204X-E at $759, and the SDS1104X-E at $500. After power up I looked more that they had similar noise floor but the Siglent attenuator is set to The models up for review are: Rigol DG1022 ( data ) Siglent SDG1025 ( data ) Siglent SDG1032X ( data ) Be sure to check out the video for this article to get a good idea of how the units look and feel. Model: Rigol DS1202Z-E: Siglent SDS1202X-E: Product: 200 MHz Digital Oscilloscope with 2 channels, 1GS/s, 24Mpoint memory: 200 MHz;2 channels; 1 GSa/s; 14 M memory depth; 100,000 wfm/s waveform capture rate; 7 Rating (38) (4) Is that even a contest if they are all for the same price for you? Owon or Hantek are worth considering only if they are significantly cheaper (by 50% or more) than the Rigol - and you can put up with the bugs, poor/nonexistent (i. They claim these will probably offer me similar results with the main difference being the overal quantity and support of the Owon being maybe a little bit less than Rigol and Siglent. Model: Rigol DS1202Z-E: Siglent SDS1202X-E: Product: 200 MHz Digital Oscilloscope with 2 channels, 1GS/s, 24Mpoint memory: 200 MHz;2 channels; 1 GSa/s; 14 M memory depth; 100,000 wfm/s waveform capture rate; 7 Rating (38) (5) Price: In Stock: Oscilloscopes/Digital Oscilloscopes ; Bandwidth: *** I'm looking at Rigol DHO800&900 series against Siglent's SDS800X-HD & 1000X-HD - top models within the line ( 4 channels, may available bandwidth) 1. While the Rigol DS1054Z I know there're several differences between these two models on the front end and ADC resolution that matters for vertical and horizontal resolution, but beyond that can you suggest which can be a better buy vs the other (Rigol vs. The stats are not so different, it has lowest price and should have three year warranty. strahd_von_zarovich. The UI is nicer/more responsive than the others, it has four separate channel controls, it's easily hackable to 100MHz+all features. I would say the Siglent may win at screen brightness/contrast, also serial decoding is free on the Siglent vs. After checking what's available on the market it essentially comes down to either the Rigol DG1062z or the Siglent SDG5082 (the Rigol DG4000 is out because it essentially combines a high price with low sample memory). I do like the side buttons on the Rigol and the selection of measurements, but also the soft buttons underneath on the Siglent. Detailed Comparison of Features and Specifications 1. Frequent Contributor; Posts: 512; Country: Re: the eternal question about rigol vs siglent « Reply #25 on: March 22, 2019, 11:31:19 am I would say the Siglent may win at screen brightness/contrast, also serial decoding is free on the Siglent vs. Fungus. While Siglent Technologies claims victory on the Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-E debate, it’s your decision which one to buy in the end. Author Topic: the eternal question about rigol vs siglent (Read 70776 times) 0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. That depends 100% on what you want to use it for, which we don't know. Now, you have a better understanding of what these two units do, which should help Anyway then I decided to check the size of the bigger Siglent out, vs the Rigol. For Siglent, the SDS1104-XE seems to offer a lot of bang for the buck, but I guess a little over your budget. I know the Siglent has a slightly better better spec at 30mhz, but for me that doesn't matter much. The SignalPath did a great review of the Rigol and indicated that Rigol may increase the voltage range for testing diodes as well as some other changes which I found interesting. Rigol vs Siglent also comes down to preference of the user interface. 5 GHz, making it suitable for most basic RF applications, including testing wireless communication devices like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and general-purpose RF design. Rigol Here’s a quick comparison table between the two scopes: The one thing that struck me on opening the Rigol box is how amazingly small the 914S is, especially compared with the Siglent (which itself is already small). The problem is that isn't SDS1204X-E Siglent missed the bandwagon and Rigol still the king, because both are 1 gs and only rigols has 4 channels is a huge difference, That responsivity UI talk is empty talk, Rigol is totally usable, and both come from "chinese engineering firmware", where is quite ease to find little problems never solved Looking at the tables for 4 channels when 50 MHz Rigol wins for me. Both devices are heavy and have a similar weight (4. I'd definitely recommend shelling out for a 4 channel The reseller stocks all models of Rigol, Siglent and R&S and support is good. Both do seem to be improving over time, and the hardware meets spec (even if there are some design issues), but you may run into bugs and odd UI decisions that could cost you time. Typically old ones. An oscilloscope consists of an electron beam that is deflected by an elect RIGOL Technologies and Siglent are both solutions in the Oscilloscopes category. Siglent I'd also suggest taking a look at the 4-channel Siglent (or Rigol) scopes. Rigol DSA815-TG: Has a frequency range of 9 kHz to 1. The side-by-side comparison of the oscilloscopes’ specifications. The RIGOL MSO5000 Series compares strongly with the DPO/MSO2000 & TBS2000 from Tek, the DSOX/MSOX2000 from Keysight, and the RTB2000 from Rohde & Schwarz on price while providing superior performance specifications, rich advanced analysis features, and next generation UI. The other seems about unboxing, teardown, and hacking. Now, being an IT tech person, I really ought to have been able to do this on computer, but I got the masking tape and tape measure out. Rigol vs Siglent oscilloscope reviews. Author Topic: Considering a new Rigol DHO924 vs. But the loud fan in the Rigol is very disturbing. popeman. The comparison table below makes it easier to choose the most fitting oscilloscope. The web Here is a quick overview of some of the main differences between Siglent and Rigol oscilloscopes: Siglent oscilloscopes tend to be more affordable than Rigol oscilloscopes. Plus seems expensive for what it is Rigol MSO5074: For what I'm paying for the 924S I might as well get this right?? But I'm concerned about its age and the Re: Siglent SDS1052DL+ vs Rigol DS154Z « Reply #13 on: January 06, 2017, 02:14:04 am » I will say I got my Siglent for WAY under MSRP, so it was a lot more than a $40 difference. Quote from: Martin72 on October 22, 2020, 07:43:37 pm On the other hand, the siglent salesmanager wrote me once, to keep the sds5000x still attractive, not all of the possible features will be implemented in the sds2000x+ too. It can be upgraded to 100 MHz with a software hack, but out of the box, it’s limited to 50 MHz. It's a nice little 'scope. nl/catalogsearch/result/?q=SDS824X-HDSDS824X I literally JUST bought a SDG2000x (almost went for the 6000x. Re: Which DC load - Rigol DL3021 or Siglent SDL1020X-E? « Reply #2 on: June 30, 2020, 03:02:29 pm » Well, now I am trying to decide between Rigol DL3021A and Siglent SD1020X. Siglent (Read 37877 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Now, being an IT tech person, I really ought to have been I like the Rigol DG1022Z and the Siglent SDG1032x. The Rigol was not very bright The Keysight was only 7" and as I'm getting older I wanted something bigger (Even tried the R&S RTB2000, but it had so much reflection) The yeah, there are reasons for that. Siglent « on: December 07, 2015, 05:15:21 pm » Hi All My old tektronix 2465 finally died it properly has a dead calibration NVRAM, I get a Test 04 Fail 11 on startup and it has a lot I tried several scope's before deciding on a Siglent SDS2104X+ (and did transform that into a SDS2354X+ incl. I have the Owon HDS-2102S scope which is a great value. 5 digit benchtop meter, 4433B ESG Sig Gene with a ton of options, ES8753 6GHz Network Analyzer, . The SIGLENT also offers a larger display screen. AWG and logic probe asde, looking at pure scope functions is there any substantial advantage on Rigol's side ? Rigol has only 1. Home News Brands Comparisons. But those extra two channels are a lifesaver the first time you need more than two for a project. Winner (Siglent vs Rigol Oscilloscope) The winner of this competition is the Rigol Company. Keysight also has a pretty new line of budget scopes (1000X series) but they start at $1500 if you want to match the channel count and bandwidth of the Rigol (which can trivially have full bandwidth and all software features unlocked). 32k memory points for instance No serial decode is another 1072CML+ is newer, with more memory, with more bandwidth for a sligtly higher price, but still no decode. The Siglent SDS1104X-E comes with 100 MHz bandwidth right out of the box, making it a better choice for Author Topic: Rigol DHO4000 Series vs Siglent SDS3000X Series (Read 725 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. But if you were to get an 1104 I did spec sheet comparison between GW Instek, Siglent and Rigol and at the end I think I am gonna pick the Siglent SDL1030X-E. Owon is still worth a look. Super Contributor; Posts: 1729; Country: Re: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E « Siglent and Rigol are slightly better but it may still take years before all the bugs get fixed. I like the large color screens, and they both have decent features. Quote Choosing a new scope Rohde-schwarz vs. In my country Rigol DS1054Z (50MHz), Hantek DSO4104B (100MHz) and OWON SDS1104 (100MHz) are available and are at the same price. 3kg/4. However, in my country, the price Rigol DG1022 vs Siglent SDG1025 vs Siglent SDG1032 Transcript. e. Hardware Design. Thanks guys! Hector Hi, I'm in a process of buying VNA and since it is my first purchase of proper VNA or spectrum analyzer, I would need some help deciding between these two: Which one would you recommend Siglent SSA3032X-R or Rigol RSA3030N? Price of Siglent is slightly lower but with Rigol is currently having some promotion so I could get EMI tool with probes for less. It's also worth mentioning that the $290 alternative The RIGOL DS1054Z and RIGOL DS1202Z-E are both extremely powerful budget-friendly digital oscilloscopes. Test & Measurement Rigol DS1054Z or Siglent SDS1104X-U. The Rigol DS1054Z has a 50 MHz bandwidth, which is suitable for most basic tasks like low-frequency signals and educational purposes. Others have proposed a Rigol model, which I think I'll check out myself. Logged HyperSpectral. Tek 22XX series hybrid DSOs have that, and if you have a dual timebase model like the 2232, you can even have alternate triggering with differing sweep rates using the B-sweep. Related Content Rigol DG1022 vs Siglent SDG1025 vs Hi everyone, I'm going to buy a 4 channel oscilloscope for about $400. Rigol" spreadsheet is still being reposted three years after it was debunked (see page two of this thread). Author Topic: Choosing a new scope Rohde-schwarz vs. vs Siglent SDS1102X Hantek DSO5102P vs Rigol DS1102E Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X Hantek DSO4102C vs Hantek DSO5102P Hantek DSO4202C vs Hantek DSO5202P Rigol Re: Siglent SPD3303X vs Rigol DP832 « Reply #24 on: July 06, 2019, 04:54:33 pm » I've owned precisely 2 Siglent products, they were both early model versions and they both had issues that Tautech acknowledges exist(ed). Looking at the tables for 4 channels when 50 MHz Rigol wins for me. So rigol could equalize it by adding the missing feature in a future firmware and of course also siglent. Super Contributor; Posts: 1635; Country: Re: Choosing a new scope Rohde-schwarz vs. Rigol MSO5074 Im also interested in the siglent parts, but Im in the UK, which tey insist is still part of the EU and are rediculaus cost add so not cost effective. In December 2022, the 2 traces flashed unexpectedly. G'Day, welcome back to the Lab. The problem is that isn't SDS1204X-E Siglent missed the bandwagon and Rigol still the king, because both are 1 gs and only rigols has 4 channels is a huge difference, That responsivity UI talk is empty talk, Rigol is totally usable, and both come from "chinese engineering firmware", where is quite ease to find little problems never solved Rigol DS1054Z or Siglent SDS1202X-E for ADC project . On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Siglent SDS1104X-E is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its reviews. tl;dr – See Conclusions at the bottom of this post. Jesus! I'm sold on the Siglent SPD-3000X-E (-E being the lower resolution version). You can see posts mentioning these defaults in this Thanks to all! Durinig the day I refrained to reply, but now I think I should. Siglent SDS1104X-E 100Mhz digital oscilloscope. You should read our reviews and get an oscilloscope to decide for yourself. If you plan on getting a Siglent for work, I wouldn’t recommend it if you need to work Hantek vs Siglent vs Rigol Oscilloscope. The Rigol has twice the memory depth (28 Mpoints vs 14) and a slightly larger display (8" vs 7") compared to the Siglent SDS1202X-E. If you read Rigol's papers, 0. Siglent vs Rigol vs Hantek – A Detailed Comparison of Leading Oscilloscope Brands [2025] When shopping for a reliable and budget-friendly oscilloscope, models from Hantek, Rigol, and Siglent stand out. These brands offer options tailored to hobbyists and professionals looking for essential functionality without breaking the bank. The features have been prioritized from 1 to 4, whereas 1 has the highest priority. Noise floor, clock and PLL phase noise and other performance aspects are measured and compared between the two models. If you were Rigol DS1022 vs Siglent SDG1032X In this article I'll compare three popular Arbitrary Function Generators. Author Topic: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E (Read 134871 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Siglent's store has them at $27 each, while the 100MHz PP510 probes are $10 each, making the probe difference $68 in total. The product overall quality is more important than bandwidth and other technical specifications for me (because I want to start some power Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1000X-E (click to enlarge) Following is the Excel table that i have used for the generating the above snapshot: rigol-vs-siglent Download. Siglent)?, also if you recommend some other brands and models that can fit my budget. Naturally, if you’re looking to buy one, Siglent SDS1202X-E Review Digital oscilloscopes have become So I sent this scope back to Rigol in Germany asking for a refund and I bought a Siglent scope. Sporting a 12 bit ADC vs an 8 bit on the siglent is another win. So the 1204 is about 1. It looks like the Rigol wins on memory, but that memory is split between all 4 channels, whereas the Siglent is per channel, making it the winner there. Siglent has -128 to -129 dBm/Hz in the mid of the span Rigol has about -120 dBm/Hz. 2 channels and decent specs. I am leaning leaning towards the Siglent SDS2104X Plus since I have read much good It is kind of a horse race between Rigol and Siglent for who’s got the better product at a given moment. Home; News; I also think Rigol does have something new comming up, such company might started working in a new asic few years ago, knowing the ds1000z would need replacement at some point, now there are a few clues pointing the release date is close. 5 times the price of the 1104. tequipment. Rigol outputs are also floating, but output 2 and 3 have the same ground. As seen from the comparison table above, the Siglent SDS1202X-E has more memory and processing capability. The MSO5000 Series provides some of the strongest value available in the Siglent is another one to check out, maybe they'll have something else you value. Alright, so perhaps that’s not the conclusion you wanted to hear, but the truth is that only you would know which oscilloscope works best for your purposes. I ordered a DSLogic Plus LA, so I'm hopefully covered for diagnosing the Author Topic: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E (Read 139741 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Keysight DSOX1102A ($675) First off, I want to say that I've read the wiki:) . They are all about the same price point and popular among makers. These scopes are competitors to each other, and presented here are a few home truths on how they stack up. Rigol DS1054Z hereafter referred to as Rigol; Siglent SDS 1102CML hereafter referred to as Siglent . P. If you are looking for an oscilloscope that offers top-quality signal fidelity and performance, then the Siglent SDS1104X-E is the perfect choice for you. 6 inch) As Similarities Between Rigol vs. Compared to the Siglent SPD3303X-E the operation and equipment of the Rigol DP831 is much better. At that price point, the Rigol has a different class of challenger that are far more capable than the In this video 'Top 3 Oscilloscopes under $400; Rigol vs Siglent vs Uni-T' I will demonstrate features of the best Oscilloscopes under $400. If you compare e. the "Rigol_50mV" vs. 1Ghz signal generator-Tektronix A6302/AM502 current clamp combination - Demoboards with several signals (and decoder functions) from Batronix and Siglent - Deskew fixture from Siglent - Analog 10Mhz test oscillator for ENOB determination - Ultra low distortion 1khz sine generator (still to be tested) - Leo Bodnar pulser 40ps I also think Rigol does have something new comming up, such company might started working in a new asic few years ago, knowing the ds1000z would need replacement at some point, now there are a few clues pointing the release date is close. Both are known for their quality and performance, but there are some key differences between the two that you Then Siglent introduces the 12 bit version with added features and faster processing!! Then Rigol introduces the little 12 bit DHO800, and this is a nice little low cost entry level DSO with 12 bit ADCs and such, which we evaluated for a client to use with their product (they needed a small form factor with VEAS mount). Apart from these problems encountered with the DS1102Z-E, if we close your eyes to these defects and bugs (that will never be resolved), it is a cheap scope that does part of the job. 5 mV is an option, which in NDN may be included in the price Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-E Comparison Digital oscilloscopes are useful instruments for many people. 2022-07-22 7:16 Re: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E « Reply #243 on: August 08, 2017, 07:50:34 am » What I have found so far, using both of them, is that the UART decoder in the Siglent is a bit sensitive to the timing settings. Some of their features are the same though. I'm wondering, if the price difference between them wasn't a factor for you, which makes a better oscilloscope?I'm concerned with quality, reliability, serviceability, "which is more of a joy to use," software quality (I hear the Keysight is Windows under the hood which frankly doesn't Key Differences 1. Choose your fighter. EEVblog #891 - Siglent SSA3021X vs Rigol DSA815 Spectrum Analyser « on: June 20, 2016, 10:02:47 am » Dave compares the new Siglent SSA3021A 2. Thx So Siglent SDS1104X-E, while being a pricier option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $349 Rigol DS1054Z, as seen on the chart below. ) days ago, and after seeing this new Rigol device today. This can help in making an informed decision before a purchase. Rigol and Siglent are in the low-cost market, so you have to look carefully at what you are buying. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Siglent SDS1104X-E is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 600+ reviews. I Author Topic: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E (Read 139673 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Oscilloscopes can be used to measure voltage, current, and time; they can also be used to observe the behavior of electronic circuits. It is an intriguing feature, but covered (probably better) by my Analog Discovery 2 (and the Audio Analyzer plugin). It's also worth mentioning that the $290 alternative Re: Rigol DG811 vs Siglent SDG810 « Reply #1 on: January 20, 2019, 10:11:03 am » For another ~$80 the SDG1032X is a far better AWG. Thread I really wanted to get Siglent SDS1104X-E, as the price should be around $100 more from SDS1104X-U, but has more features, and it is recommended very well by most fellows. 5 mV is an option, which in NDN may be included in the price (I don't remember), there is definitely 24 MS of memory in the promotion. The SDM3065X series is especially well-suited for the needs of high-accuracy and First Oscilloscope Advice- Keysight DSOX1204G vs. $280 regular non-clearance price). I really appreciate your feedback and I am inclined to go for the Rigol DS1054Z, for the following reasons: 1) It is 64Euro cheaper, which represents 19% and in my case does make a difference (remember, I am not planing to make any money with it) 2) It does have 4 channels, which is Hi at all, This thread should be not a better/worser/ how long is your dick thing, it only compares the features the two scopes got, with focus of the software-features. Base Specs Let's Other users found operating bugs. frankvh2. The Rigol DS1052E actually has it listed, I've never had one--but you can buy that new. Both also offer models with built-in arbitrary waveform generators and Re: Rigol 5074 vs Siglent SDS2104X Plus vs Keysight DSOX1204G « Reply #99 on: April 12, 2021, 10:47:39 pm » SDS2000X Plus HW frequency counter is always ON at top right of display plus several other frequency related measurements can be selected from the Measurements menu. For the desk based stuff, then a Rigol or Siglent would be my choice if I was in the market for a new scope. Dave compares the new Siglent SSA3021A 2. vs Siglent SDS1102X Hantek DSO5102P vs Rigol DS1102E Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X Hantek DSO4102C vs Hantek DSO5102P More comparisons. Save your lunch money for a few more weeks and get the better product. 30 MHz, 2ch and hackable to 60 MHz and does sine and square wave to max frequency. Member. Author Topic: Siglent SDS1104X-E vs. I am deciding between: Siglent SDL1030X-E (or SDL1030X) and Rigol DL3031 (or DL3031A) Seems like the Siglent is newer, but they have pretty much the same stats and I am not sure which is better to invest money in. You can see posts mentioning these defaults in this forum. The Hanteks could be had at around half the price. The Items:SDS824X-HD : https://www. In this section, we take a look at the four best oscilloscopes that are available from Rigol and Siglent so that we are aware of all the features that may be available in them. Author Topic: the eternal question about rigol vs siglent (Read 70839 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. g. Re: Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1202X-E « Reply #174 on: June 28, 2017, 09:32:13 pm » I own several pieces of Agilent/Keysight test gear, MSO7104B 1GHz 4-channel scope, N1996A CSA Spectrum Analyzer, 34461A 6. They filled the market for those who could not spend the extra €200-250 to afford a proper entry level DSO from Siglent, Rigol or GW Instek. Test & Measurement First Oscilloscope Advice- Keysight DSOX1204G vs. Rigol vs Siglent Comparison Table. 100 MHz 2 channels 24/12 Mpts memory vs 16/8 on the DS1052E (though the DS1052E has a "long" memory mode whatever that is) more trigger types than the DS1052E protocol trigger/decode support larger display (7 inch vs 5. If you had to choose between these 2, what would you take? I've used both Siglent and Rigol lower range 'scopes and spectrum analyzers and I think Siglent have the edge, but I suspect they are converging through the strong competition. You could save up to 70% when you switch to RIGOL. Feature-1: Bandwidth and FFT size. Both 4 channel scopes are specified I had the opportunity to test the Because of this, even the Rigol 1052E as well as the corresponding bottom of the barrel Siglent scopes (CML etc. Forums. Rigol Germany and Rigol in China have NEVER responded to my emails complaining about the defaults of my scope. RIGOL Technologies is ranked #2, while Siglent is ranked #1. Siglent SDS1202X-E vs Rigol DS1202Z-E. Hi eevblog forum I am going for a new scope, and I have looked at these models: Rigol mso5074 Siglent SDS2104X Plus I am in the lucky situation I actually can get them at about the same price point plus/minus some (minimal difference) with original logic probes. . Tektronix Oscilloscopes. Rigol Oscilloscopes Comparison. good luck if the thing breaks or a fatal bug is discovered) support. ) provide filters. I am really pretty confident in my decision to stay with Siglent. eleshop. You've only used two words so far, the answers to those words are: Neither is "intuitive", the Siglent is "faster" If you work on digital circuits the the Rigol is better (4 channels), if you work on Radio circuits then the Siglent is better (higher bandwidth, better FFT). Im wondering if thats still a thing or if people have found their way past that? Signal Generator Comparison: Rigol DG1022Z vs. Bandwidth. Once you know that, you In all categories the Siglent SA is better than the Rigol. If those are important, it will push the price of the Rigol to $3400 with the software bundle. When 2 channels are enough and 100-200 MHz is needed then Siglent. Both scopes seem to have crowded the screen on the LHS and RHS so that the waveforms are smaller than they need to be and (as I read it) no option Hi, I'm curious about the Siglent SDS1104X-E vs. To keep it simple, there are only 2 main differences between these digital oscilloscopes. For instance with the larger FFT size of 1 Mpt in the Siglent They are used in a variety of applications, such as automotive diagnosis, medical imaging, and telecommunications. RIGOL Technologies holds a The waveform capture rate of the Siglent is over 10 times faster than the Rigol which means that its ability to capture signal anomalies is significantly better. Re: the eternal question about rigol vs siglent « Reply #69 on: March 23, 2019, 02:02:13 pm » If I was really interested in looking at PSU ripple (ie. What do you need the scope for? Hobby or work? Which features do you require? Most scopes will display a signal just fine but the cheaper scopes usually fail when it comes to features like measurements, maths and decoding because the firmware isn't . karkoon. I have only considered the features that I Odd comparison, very soon to be last gen 8 bit scope (albeit one of the best on the low end) vs new gen 12 bit scope. As an example, I have an older Tektronix DSO with 2. HalFET. Super Contributor; Posts: 17496; Country: Re: the eternal question about rigol vs siglent « Reply #50 on: March 23, 2019, 09:22:27 am So Siglent SDS1104X-E, while being a pricier option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $349 Rigol DS1054Z, as seen on the chart below. I'm surprised Rigol isn't trying to be more competitive with a new product like this, either in specs or price, in respect to their MAIN competition, Siglent. The comparison will highlight features and ease of use and will not be a tutorial on how to use the scopes. ). With our Exclusive 30-Day Money Back Guarantee on RIGOL oscilloscopes there is zero risk - you have nothing to lose! Talk to a product expert to learn more. But don’t be disheartened by this result. Rigol DS1054Z Advice? « Reply #375 on: September 06, 2018, 03:36:36 pm I'm torn between a few models: Rigol DHO924S: Obviously heard great things but worried about poor accuracy vs siglent and being stuck with internal questionable quality AWG for bode plots. a pricey upgrade on the Rigol. ; the Siglent looks and feels kind of cheapish (plastic quality etc. rakwux tyvgnz dxme yegp iqug vii tcpy sve yznrza wdicka